Hypertherm, Inc. v. American Torch Tip Company

Filing 364

ORDER - parties to file joint notice specifying parts of pending motions that have been resolved or changed in any respect by July 24, 2008 order by 11/26/08. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline set for 11/26/2008.) Signed by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Hypertherm, Inc. v. American Torch Tip Company Civil No. 05-cv-373-JD Procedural Order In the order issued on July 24, 2008, the court directed the parties to file a notice specifying the parts of pending motions that had been resolved or changed by that order. The parties filed a joint notice on August 18, 2008, that specified which parts they agreed were changed by the order and also their issues of disagreement, largely based on ATTC's then-pending motion to reconsider the July 24 order. As the motion for reconsideration has now been denied, the grounds for ATTC's differing positions would appear to have been resolved. Therefore, the parties shall file a joint notice on or before November 26, 2008, clearly specifying the parts of pending motions that have been resolved or changed in any respect by the July 24, 2008, order. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. United States District Judge November 19, 2008 cc: Jill C. Anderson, Esquire Jacob Baron, Esquire Steven Abuer, Esquire Lucas Blower, Esquire Seth Cannon, Esquire Joseph Capraro, Jr., Esquire Christopher Carney, Esquire Jeffery Cross, Esquire Joseph Dattilo, Esquire Ami Gandhi, Esquire Maia Harris, Esquire Marc Kallish, Esquire Rhett Krulla, Esquire Jonathan Lax, Esquire Richard Nelson, Esquire W. Scott O'Connell, Esquire Jeremy Oszek, Esquire Richard Rochford, Jr., Esquire David Ruoff, Esquire John Skeriotis, Esquire Benjamin Stern, Esquire Wayne Tang, Esquire 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?