Hopkins v. Coplan et al

Filing 2

ORDER to treat this case as a new complaint nunc pro tunc and directed the Clerk of Court to open a new case based 1:04-cv-30-SM. Thus the Clerk of Court shall treat this new complaint as filed on the date the Motion to Amend was filed, which was February 27, 2006, and the court waives the filing fee associated with the filing of a new complaint. Signed by Judge James R. Muirhead. (cms, )

Download PDF
Hopkins v. Coplan et al Doc. 2 Case 1:06-cv-00096-JD Document 2 Filed 03/20/2006 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kenneth Hopkins v. Civil No. 04-cv-030-SM Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, et al. ORDER By order dated March 13, 2006, the court ruled that it would treat the Second Amended Complaint filed in this case as a new complaint nunc pro tunc and directed the Clerk of Court to open a new case based on this Complaint. Thus, the Clerk of Court shall treat this new Complaint as filed on the date the Motion to Amend was filed, which was February 27, 2006, and the court waives the filing fee associated with the filing of a new complaint. SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ James R. Muirhead United States Magistrate Judge Date: March 20, 2006 cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq. Mary E. Schwarzer, Esq. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?