Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections et al

Filing 13

Agreement of Acceptance of Service by NH Department of Corrections, James Daley (Livernois, Andrew)

Download PDF
Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections et al Doc. 13 Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 13 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Docket No. 1:06-cv-321 Charles Jay Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections, Jeff Perkins, Gency Morse and James Daly ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE This is to notify the Court that the New Hampshire Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, accepts service on behalf of Defendants, NH Department of Corrections, Jeff Perkins, and James Daly named in this action, and will represent them pursuant to the terms of RSA 99-D. Pursuant to the Court's Order (dated January 26, 2007) (Muirhead, J.) the Office of the Attorney General shall file an answer or otherwise plea on behalf of the defendants on or before March 19, 2007. Consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the State reserves the right to challenge this Court's subject matter jurisdiction, and to raise any and all other objections. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Respectfully submitted, NH Department of Corrections, Jeff Perkins, and James Daly By their attorneys, KELLY A. AYOTTE Attorney General /s/ Andrew B. Livernois_____ Andrew B. Livernois Bar No. 14350 Assistant Attorney General New Hampshire Department of Justice 33 Capitol Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301-6397 (603) 271-3650 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 13 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 2 of 2 February 8, 2007 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing were conventionally served upon the opposing party via by postage prepaid US Mail: CHARLES JAY WOLFF, 24322 P.O. BOX 14 CONCORD, NH 03301 /s/ Andrew B. Livernois______ Andrew B. Livernois, Bar No. 14350 174350.doc 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?