Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections et al

Filing 56

ORDER the egg filed by the plaintiff is to be destroyed re: 55 Motion for Contempt,injunction. Signed by Judge James R. Muirhead. (mxm)

Download PDF
Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections et al Doc. 56 Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 56 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Charles Jay Wolff v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections, et al. ORDER Plaintiff has filed a hard-boiled egg as part of his preliminary injunction request. Discussion No fan I am Of the egg at hand. Just like no ham On the kosher plan. This egg will rot I kid you not. And stink it can This egg at hand. There will To prove a There will Objections be no eggs at court clog in your aort. be no eggs accepted. all will be rejected. Civil No. 06-cv-321-PB From this day forth This court will ban hard-boiled eggs of any brand. And if you should not understand The meaning of the ban at hand Then you should contact either Dan, the Deputy Clerk, or my clerk Jan. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 56 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2 I do not like eggs in the file. I do not like them in any style. I will not take them fried or boiled. I will not take them poached or broiled. I will not take them soft or scrambled Despite an argument well-rambled. No fan I am Of the egg at hand. Destroy that egg! Today! Today! Today I say! Without delay! SO ORDERED (with apologies to Dr. Seuss). ____________________________________ James R. Muirhead United States Magistrate Judge Date: cc: September 18, 2007 Charles Jay Wolff, pro se Andrew Livernois, Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?