Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections et al

Filing 59

OBJECTION to 53 MOTION for Contempt, 54 MOTION to Compel the prison to provide the plaintiff with 3 nutritious meals per day, 55 MOTION for Contempt filed by NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, James Daley, Jeff Perkins. (Livernois, Andrew)

Download PDF
Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections et al Doc. 59 Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 59 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ___________________________________ | | | Plaintiff, | | v. | | New Hampshire Department of | Corrections, et al., | | Defendants. | ___________________________________ | Charles Wolff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-321-PB OBJECTION TO MOTION(S) FOR CONTEMPT NOW COME the Defendants, by and through their counsel, the Office of the Attorney General, and object to the Defendants three recently filed motions for contempt, stating as follows: 1. Plaintiff is an incarcerated inmate who has brought this action against the Department of Corrections and a number of its employees and officials on the ground that his civil rights have been violated in contravention of 42 U.S.C. 1983. In particular, Plaintiff claims that he is not being provided with a nutritionally-adequate kosher diet. 2. Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction on July 9, 2007. An evidentiary hearing was held before Magistrate Muirhead on August 2, 2007. The Court issued a provisional Report and Recommendation on August 3, 2007. The parties are currently awaiting a ruling from the Court. 3. In the meantime, the Plaintiff has filed three separate motions to have Mr. Rick Stacy, a DOC staff member who works in the kitchen, held in contempt. See Docket No. 53; Docket No. 54 and Docket No. 55. The gravamen of all three motions is the same that the Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 59 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 4 kitchen staff continues to serve Mr. Wolff hard-boiled eggs for breakfast. Wolff has claimed repeatedly that hard-boiled eggs make him sick, and that he cannot tolerate them. The Department of Corrections disputes this claim, especially given the fact that Mr. Wolff has admitted that he has no problem with scrambled eggs or fried eggs. 4. The Defendants object to all three of Plaintiff's motions, which are entirely baseless and frivolous, on the same grounds. First, in order to prevail on a motion for contempt, Mr. Wolff would need to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Mr.Stacy violated a Court order. See, Goya Foods, Inc. v. Wallack Mgmt. Co., 290 F.3d 63, 77 (1st Cir. 2002); AccuSoft Corp. v. Palo, 237 F.3d 31, 47 (1st Cir. 2001). In this case, there has been no court order issued to Mr. Stacy or any other member of the Department of Corrections staff regarding what food Mr. Wolff should be served. The Court has never ruled that it is unconstitutional for Mr. Wolff to be served eggs. Such an order is highly unlikely, given the factual circumstances of this case. Furthermore, even if the Court had issued an order, it would need to be exceedingly clear and direct, since "any ambiguities or uncertainties in such a court order must be read in a light favorable to the person charged with contempt." Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp, 947 F.2d 11, 16 (1st Cir. 1991); see also Gilday v. Dubois, 124 F.3d 277, 286 (1st Cir. 1997). 5. Mr. Wolff has been seen repeatedly by the medical staff at the Department of Corrections, and has been sent to an outside dietician for a consult. There has been no confirmation by medical professionals that Mr. Wolff has an allergy to eggs, or any other objective medical condition that would preclude him from eating hard-boiled eggs. Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 59 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 3 of 4 6. Admittedly, Mr. Wolff has high cholesterol which is currently under control with medication. Therefore, he should probably avoid eating egg yolks. However, Mr. Wolff can simply set aside the yolks and eat the white portion of the eggs if he desires. 7. No separate memorandum of law has been filed with this objection, as the relevant facts and legal authority are cited herein. WHEREFORE the Defendants respectfully request that the Honorable Court: A. B. Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt; Grant any additional relief as is just and proper. Respectfully submitted, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. By and through their attorneys, KELLY A. AYOTTE ATTORNEY GENERAL \s\ Andrew B. Livernois_________ Andrew B. Livernois, Bar No.14350 Assistant Attorney General Civil Bureau 33 Capitol Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301-6397 (603) 271-3650 Certification of Service September 28, 2007 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed this day, postage prepaid, to Charles Wolff, pro se, P.O. Box 14, Concord, NH 03302. /s/ Andrew B. Livernois Andrew B. Livernois Doc: 221137 Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 59 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?