Dillon et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al

Filing 132

ORDER denying 130 Motion for Reconsideration of 125 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Michael C. Dillon v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al. ORDER The plaintiff, Michael C. Dillon, moves to reconsider this court's order granting summary judgment for the defendants on all claims, invoking Rule 60(b). That rule authorizes relief from a Civil No. 07-cv-0070-JL

judgment on six different grounds, but Dillon does not attempt to demonstrate any of them. Instead, he either recasts the same

arguments already rejected by the court in its prior order or inappropriately makes new arguments in violation of the applicable rule of procedure, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(6), e.g., that the pre-settlement injunction in Curry somehow barred him from seeking damages but not other relief in state court, which are untimely and without merit. 129) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dated: cc: March 4, 2009 The motion (document no.

Walter L. Maroney, Esq. William P. Breen, Esq. Dorothy A. Davis, Esq.