Shatney v. USA
ORDER Government shall respond to Motion (complaint) as to whether it will waive service of process. If it waives service, it shall file an answer or other responsive pleading withing 60 days of July 12, 2007 re:1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (cmp)
Shatney v. USA
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
US v. Robert Shatney Criminal No. 05-cr-168-01-SM
ORDER Re: Document No. 37, Motion for Return of Property Ruling: As the government points out, the underlying criminal case is closed. Accordingly, Shatney's motion for return of property is treated as a civil complaint. See Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States, 257 F.3d 31, 36 (1st Cir. 2001). The government will advise the clerk (Deputy Clerk Joyce Roy) on or before July 12, 2007, whether the government, having actual knowledge of the complaint, and having preliminarily responded to the motion's filing, whether it will waive service of process. If it waives service it shall file an answer or other responsive pleading within sixty (60) days of July 12, 2007. If it will not, the clerk will prepare summonses and serve them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1) on the United States Attorney for this district, the Attorney General of the United States, and the United States Drug Enforcement Agency. The Clerk shall open a new civil case, treating defendant's motion as a civil complaint challenging the government's administrative forfeiture of the claimed property. So Ordered. Steven J. McAuliffe Chief District Judge Date: cc: July 10, 2007
Robert Rabuck, Esq. Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq. Robert Shatney, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?