Horstkotte v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
Filing
59
ORDER Prohibiting remote access to certain exhibits re: 58 Objection to Report and Recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (cmp)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Todd Horstkotte v. NHDOC, Commissioner Civil No. 08-cv-61-JL
ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS
The exhibits to the objection to R&R in the above-captioned case contains one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is contained in the Objection to R&R. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a non-party from obtaining remote electronic access to the Objection to R&R, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ James R. Muirhead James R. Muirhead United States Magistrate Judge
Date: September 4 , 2008
cc:
Todd Horstkotte, Pro se Deborah Weissbard, Esq.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
