Beane v. Beane

Filing 39

ORDER granting 31 Motion to Amend 21 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim. Within 48 hours counsel shall electronically refile the pleading attached to the Motion to Amend using the appropriate event in CMECF. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Amended Pleadings due by 3/23/2009. (jb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Glenn L. Beane v. Alan F. Beane ORDER The defendant's motion to amend answer to amended complaint (document no. 31) is granted. No deadline to amend pleadings has Civil No. 08-cv-00236-JL

yet been established due to the filing of dispositive motions. The objection does not allege prejudice, futility (no claim of res judicata or collateral estoppel is asserted), lack of diligence, or fraud. The court finds no undue delay, bad faith,

dilatory motive, inexcusable repetitious failure to cure deficiencies in previous amendments, undue prejudice, futility, fraud, or frivolity. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15; Foman V. Davis, 371

U.S 178, 182 (1962); In re Rauh, 119 F. 3d 46,52 (1st. Cir. 1997); Executive Leasing Corp. v. Banco Popular, 48 F. 3d 66,71 (1st. Cir. 1995). Further, counsel shall confer with each other and the Deputy Clerk to schedule the Preliminary Pretrial Conference. The

conference will be scheduled on a date that will allow counsel to fully comply with FRCP 26(f) and Local Rule 26.1.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dated: cc: March 19, 2009

W. E. Whittington, Esq. William S. Gannon, Esq.

2