Braun v. GT Solar International, Inc., et al
Filing
139
///APPROVED ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT re: 132 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Plan of Allocation. Signed by District Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SEP 2 7 2011
FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
IRVING S. BRAUN, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-00312-JL
vs.
(MAIN CASE)
GT SOLAR INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,
<&-
Defendants.
"{n
[PRBBOSEDl ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
^T
On the ^ /
day of J&gj.
, 2011, a hearing having been held before
this Court to determine: (a) whether the above-captioned federal securities class action
(the "Action") satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Rule
23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) whether the terms of the proposed
settlement ("Settlement") described in the Stipulation of Settlement dated May 4, 2011
(the "Stipulation"), are fair, reasonable and adequate, and should be approved by the
Court; (c) whether the proposed allocation of the Settlement Fund (the "Plan of
Allocation") is fair and reasonable and should be approved by the Court; (d) whether the
Order and Final Judgment as provided under the Stipulation should be entered,
dismissing the Action on the merits and with prejudice, and to determine whether the
release of the Released Claims as against the Released Persons, as set forth in the
Stipulation, should be ordered; (e) whether the Fee and Expense Application should be
approved; and (f) such other matters as the Court might deem appropriate; and
The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing held on
-XJfrpv' //%
' Q for fees and
expenses accrued through August 23, 2011, which shall be paid out of the Settlement
Fund.
17.
State Action Plaintiff Joyce T. Hamel, in recognition of her efforts on
behalf of the Class and as an "award of reasonable costs and expenses (including lost
wages) directly relating to the representation of the [Settlement Class]" as provided for in
15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(4), is awarded $
3 ; C^
7
\ ^0, which shall be paid out of the
Settlement Fund. This award is reasonable and represents a fair and reasonable amount
in view of the work performed, applicable legal principles, and benefit obtained for the
Class.
18.
The attorneys' fees, case contribution award, and expenses approved by
the Court in ^114-16 hereof shall be payable from the Settlement Fund to Lead Counsel,
on behalf of itself, Plaintiffs' Counsel, and Plaintiffs immediately upon entry of this
Order, notwithstanding the existence of any potential appeal or collateral attack on this
Order.
19.
Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the Parties and the Class
Members for all matters relating to the Action, including the administration,
interpretation, effectuation or enforcement of the Stipulation and this Order and Final
Judgment, and including any application for fees and expenses incurred in connection
with administering and distributing the settlement proceeds to the Class Members.
20.
Without further order of the Court, the Parties may agree to reasonable
extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation.
21.
In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance
with the terms of the Stipulation, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to
the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in
such event, all orders entered, including those certifying a settlement Class, and releases
delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in
accordance with the Stipulation.
8
22.
There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order and Final
Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is directed pursuant to Rule
54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SIGNED this Jf
day of
crf^j-
2011.
te^a
THE HONORABLE JpfSEPH N. LAPLANTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?