C.A..L.L. Group, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al

Filing 22

ORDER denying motion to remand 5 (Objection to removal). Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (mm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE C.A.L.L. Group, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al. ORDER The central question presented by C.A.L.L.'s motion for remand is whether one or more of its claims are completely preempted by the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act ("PMPA").1 If Case No. 08-CV-391-PB the answer to this question is yes, then remand is not warranted. The parties have failed to analyze this issue under the appropriate legal standard. The most recent Supreme Court case that addresses this subject is Beneficial Nat'l Bank v. Anderson, 539 U.S. 1 (2003), and the most recent First Circuit case is Fayard v. Ne. Vehicle Servs., 533 F.3d 42, 45 (1st Cir. 2008). Fayard describes a two-part test in which a court must ask whether there is "exclusive federal regulation of the subject matter of the asserted state claim" and then determine whether there is a "federal cause of action for wrongs of the same type" C.A.L.L. filed an "Objection to Remand" (Doc. No. 5) which I treat as a motion because it seeks affirmative relief. 1 as any of the causes of action alleged in the complaint. Id. Because the parties have not attempted to analyze the remand issue under this standard, I cannot tell from their memoranda whether any of plaintiff's claims are completely preempted. In particular, I need to know whether the complaint asserts claims for wrongful nonremoval or termination and, if so, whether such claims are completely preempted under the two-part test announced in Fayard. Accordingly, I deny the motion to remand (Doc. No. 5) without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to file a new motion to remand within 30 days. SO ORDERED. /s/Paul Barbadoro Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge May 8, 2009 cc: William Aivalikles, Esq. Courtney H.G. Herz, Esq. Paul Sanson, Esq. Sonia Pedraza, Esq. Robert Lucic, Esq. Douglas Steere, Esq. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?