Presby Environmental, Inc. v. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

Filing 23

PROCEDURAL ORDER re 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Hearing: ( Notice of Compliance Deadline set for 5/11/2009 for parties to file timeline, Statement of Agreed Facts and Disputed Facts, and Proposed Order as outlined. Witness List due by 5/11/2009. Exhibit List due by 5/11/2009.) Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Presby Environmental, Inc. v. Civil No. 08-cv-00434-JL Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. PROCEDURAL ORDER On or before May 11, 2009, the parties shall jointly file: · a single timeline setting forth all pertinent dates and events, in whatever format the parties jointly choose (in other words, the parties need not comply with Local Rule 5.1(a) with respect to the timeline); a single Statement of Agreed Facts followed by a Statement of Disputed Facts. The disputed facts are not an invitation to advocacy (i.e., "The plaintiff can not establish irreparable harm because....." or "There is a strong likelood of success on the merits because...."). The parties should simply list facts they intend to establish at the hearing, or which they contend will not be established at the hearing. · On or before May 11, 2009, each party shall file: · · a witness list; and an exhibit list. Counsel shall confer before the hearing to identify all areas of agreement and disagreement as to the admissibility of each exhibit. On or before May 11, 2009, the plaintiff shall file a proposed proposed order in compliance with Rule 65 and Local Rule 65.1. The order shall specifically address the amount of the bond required under Rule 65(c). SO ORDERED. Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dated: cc: April 10, 2009 David W. Rayment, Esq. Walter B. Pribis, Esq. Teresa C. Tucker, Esq. Scott C. Walker, Esq. Daniel J. Mullen, Esq. Emily E. Root, Esq. Keith Shumate, Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?