Griffiths v. Lloyd's of London et al

Filing 77

ORDER denying 64 Motion to Amend Caption; denying 65 Motion requiring "Certain Underwriters" at Lloyd's London to Explain Who These "Certain Underwriters" in Fact are, and if the "Certain underw riters" are not human beings, who their Principals in fact are so their name and/or Personages, and Principals can be properly docketed and captioned; denying 66 Motion to Have Transcripts or Recordings Provided at Government Expense; denying 67 Motion to Have Pacer Account Provided at Government Expense; denying 68 Motion to Reopen this Case; denying 70 Motion to Bring Forth New Evidence, Specifically Annulment of Alleged False Charges, to be Considered by the Courts, But Ex Parte to the Jury; denying 72 Motion for Court Disclosure; denying 73 Motion for Entire Case to be Reviewed by Magistrate Judge; denying 74 Motion to Vacate 45 Judgment; denying 75 Motion for Continuance as Author of Prior Proceedings Will be Making Revisions; denying 76 Motion for Reconsideration re 53 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)

Download PDF
Griffiths v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al Doc. 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Joseph Griffiths v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al. ORDER All of Griffiths's pending motions and petitions (document nos. 64-70, and 72-76) are DENIED. Before making any of these Civil No. 08-cv-00507-JL filings, Griffiths filed a notice of appeal, which divested this court of authority to adjudicate this case by placing that authority in the court of appeals. 145 F.3d 446, 455 (1st Cir. 1998). See United States v. Brooks, While this rule has a few limited exceptions, see id. at 456, none of them applies to any of the pending motions or petitions, save for the petitions for transcripts and a PACER account at government expense (document nos. 66-67) and "for Court Disclosures" relative to its rulings in other pro se cases (document no. 72). are denied: Those motions, then, Griffiths has not satisfied the conditions necessary to obtain transcripts at government expense, see 28 U.S.C. § 753(f); there is no fee to register for a PACER account, see www.pacer.gov/reg_pacer.html; and this court's opinions are searchable for free on its publicly available website. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dated: cc: July 1, 2010 Joseph Griffiths, pro se Ralph Suozzo, Esq. Grace V.B. Garcia, Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?