Briand v. Berlin, City of et al
Filing
9
ORDER: the clerk's office is to redocket 6 Motion for Reconsideration as an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and forward it to the Chief Judge for his consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (jab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
John S. Briand v. City of Berlin, et al. ORDER Civil No. 09-cv-003-SM
This matter originally came before me for preliminary review because Briand, at the time of filing, was a prisoner. U.S.C. § 1915A(a). See 28
After consideration of Briand's complaint, I
recommended that it be dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief might be granted (document no. 5). Briand has
now filed an additional pleading which was docketed as a motion to reconsider (document no. 6). The filing raises two objections
to my Report and Recommendation: (1) that I mistakenly indicated that Briand was proceeding in forma pauperis when, in fact, he paid the filing fee in full, and (2) that my recommendation of dismissal was based on an incorrect analysis of the legal claims presented in the complaint. As to the Briand's first contention, I acknowledge that my identification of Briand as an in forma pauperis plaintiff was in
error.
I therefore direct that the relevant language be stricken
from my Report and Recommendation. The central thrust of Briand's most recent filing, however, is that my Report and Recommendation was erroneous and should not be accepted by the Chief Judge. As such, this filing is properly
considered as an objection to my Report and Recommendation, and not a motion to reconsider. I have reviewed the objection, and
nothing in it alters my April 1, 2009 recommendation of dismissal. Accordingly, I direct the Clerk's Office to redocket
Briand's April 9, 2009 filing as an objection to my Report and Recommendation, and to forward it to the Chief Judge for his consideration. SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ James R. Muirhead United States Magistrate Judge Date: cc: May 7, 2009 John Briand, pro se
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?