v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center et al
Filing
113
ORDER: DHMC to file a motion and memo addressing the scope of the issues and evidence for trial by 5/31/2011; defendant's response due 10 days thereafter. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
v.
Civil No. 09-cv-160-JD
Cross Country Travcorps, Inc., et al.
Procedural Order
During the final pretrial conference, a dispute arose
between Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center and the defendants as
to the scope of the issues and evidence for trial.
In the final
pretrial conference order, issued on April 6, 2011, the court
directed DHMC to file a motion and memorandum addressing the
scope of the issues and evidence for trial by May 5, 2011.
DHMC
filed a memorandum but failed to file a motion as it was directed
to do.
In the absence of a motion, DHMC has not informed the court
and opposing parties what relief it is seeking.
The court will
not attempt to ferret out from the memorandum the nature of the
parties’ dispute and what specific relief DHMC is seeking.
Therefore, DHMC shall file a motion, with a supporting
memorandum, seeking specific relief in terms of defining the
issues for trial and the scope of the evidence, including any
specific limitations on evidence which DHMC contends should
apply.
The defendants shall file their responses to the motion,
addressing the relief sought by DHMC.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff shall file a motion
with a supporting memorandum, as directed in this order, on or
before May 31, 2011.
The defendants shall file their responses
within ten days after the motion and memorandum is filed.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.
United States District Judge
May 19, 2011
cc:
Andrew D. Dunn, Esquire
Ronald J. Lajoie, Esquire
Anil Madan, Esquire
Joseph Gardner Mattson, Esquire
Ralph Suozzo, Esquire
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?