Herbst et al v. Attitash Bear Peak Resort

Filing 13

ORDER granting with further modifications 12 Motion to Continue and Extend Deadlines Pretrial Schedule. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)

Download PDF
Herbst et al v. L.B.O. Holding, Inc. Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Edward Herbst, et al. v. L.B.O. Holding, Inc. ORDER The motion to continue and extend deadlines pretrial schedule (doc. no. 12) is granted, with further modifications. Any reply to a summary judgment objection must be filed within 7 calendar days of the objection, and grants leave to file (but does not require) a surreply, limited to issues and arguments advanced in the reply, to be filed no later than five days of the reply. The parties and counsel should not assume that this Civil No. 09-cv-00233-JL expedited schedule will necessarily result in a speedier resolution of the motion(s) for summary judgment; the intent of the expedited schedule is, for the sake of the parties and counsel, to enable a decision on the motion further in advance of trial. SO ORDERED. Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com Dated: cc: November 9, 2010 R. Peter Taylor, Esq. Thomas B.S. Quarles, Jr., Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?