Wamala v. Nashua, City of et al

Filing 93

ORDER re: 91 Notice of Appeal. Court considers this to be an Interlocutory Appeal. Court will treat as a Motion to Certify an Interlocutory Appeal, response, if any, due 12/22/10. ( Follow up on Objection on 12/20/2010.) So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)

Wamala v. Nashua, City of et al

Doc. 93

U.S. DIS-TRIC-T Cm$ DISTRICT OF N.H. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE TILED DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ^^ A^

*

28

Theresa Wamala v. City of Nashua, et al. Civil No. 09-cv-304-JD

ORDER

On December 13, 2010, plaintiff Theresa Wamala filed a document entitled "Notice of Appeal." As Judgment has not yet entered, the Court considers this to be an Interlocutory Appeal, for which permission to appeal is required. 28 USC § 1292(b); Fed. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the Court will treat the Notice of Appeal as a Motion to Certify an Interlocutory Appeal, to which the defendant shall respond, if they so choose, on or before December 22, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

December 2010

V y^j^^J^liSW^X-^Tosepr A. DiClerico, Jr. sepn NJ United States District Judge

cc:

Theresa Wamala, pro se Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.

Dockets.Justia.com