Banks v. Hall et al
Filing
40
ORDER re: 38 Motion for Reconsideration - plaintiff has until 10/1/10 to object. Set Deadlines as to 38 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Denying Rule 6(b)(1)(A) Request for Extending Time for Taking Plaintiff's Deposition. (Follow up on Objection on 10/1/2010.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (dae)
Banks v. Hall et al
Doc. 40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Robert Banks v. Mark B. Hall, et al. Civil No. 09-cv-326-JD
ORDER In light of the expedited discovery in this case and the deadlines set by the Scheduling Order (Endorsed Order 4/07/10), plaintiff must file by October 1, 2010, his objection, if any, to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Rule 6(b)(1)(A) Request for Extending Time for Taking Plaintiffs' Deposition (Doc. No. 38). See Local Rule 7.1 (b) ("Except as
otherwise required by law or order of the court, every objection... shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date the motion is served . . . .) (emphasis added). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge Dated: cc: September 23, 2010
Kevin H. O'Neill, Esq. Robert Banks, pro se
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?