Lobozzo v. Sunnyside Motors, Inc., et al
ORDER approving 18 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 7 days. Case Track: Standard. Affirmative defenses stricken as outlined. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 4/30/2011. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 6/30/2010. Mediation Follow Up on 3/31/2011. (dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Erin Lobozzo v. Sunnyside Motors, Inc., et al. Civil No. 10-cv-00043-JL
ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on March 23, 2010. The Discovery Plan (document no. 18) is approved as submitted. Jury trial scheduled for October, 2011.
Based on the discussions between the court and counsel at the conference, the following are stricken without prejudice to being reinstated on request if warranted by the evidence: · Sunnyside's affirmative defenses: 9th, 11th, and 13th. · The Honda defendants' affirmative defenses: 8th, 12th, and 15th. Summary Judgment. The parties and counsel are advised that 2nd-6th, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 8th,
compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 7.2(b), regarding evidentiary support for factual assertions, and specification and delineation of material issues of disputed fact, will be required.
Discovery disputes will be handled by
the undersigned judge, as opposed to the Magistrate Judge, in the normal course. No motion to compel is necessary. The party or
counsel seeking discovery-related relief should confer with adverse counsel to choose mutually available dates, and then contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a conference call with the court. The court will inform counsel and parties what written
materials, if any, should be submitted in advance of the conference call. Customary motions to compel discovery, while disfavored by the undersigned judge, are nonetheless permissible. If counsel
prefer traditional discovery litigation to the conference call procedure set forth above, any such motion to compel should expressly request, in the title of the motion, a referral to the United States Magistrate Judge. normally be granted. Such referral requests will
If the Magistrate Judge is recused,
alternate arrangements will be made.
SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dated: March 23, 2010 cc: Kevin P. Scanlon, Esq. David P. Dwork, Esq. Andrew Ranks, Esq. Adam A. Larson, Esq. 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?