Veale et al v. Furness et al

Filing 93

ORDER denying in part and granting in part 77 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Request for appointment of counsel denied. Request for extension of time to file responsive pleadings granted to October 3, 2011. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
David Veale, et al.
v.

Civil No. 10-cv-147-JL

Robert T. Furness, et al.
O R D E R
The plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel (document
no. 77) is denied in part and granted in part.
motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Plaintiffs’
The defendants’

objections accurately set forth the law, and the motion is denied
on the grounds stated therein.

Plaintiffs’ request for an

extension on the deadline to file responsive pleadings is granted
On or before October 3, the plaintiffs shall file

in part.

responses to any pending motions.

No further extensions will be

granted without good cause which must be established with
specific particularity.

The court does not anticipate granting

further extensions.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Dated:

September 12, 2011

cc:

David T. Veale, pro se
Scott W. Veale, pro se
James D. Gleason, Esq.
Alan D. Rose, Esq.
Lisa A. Tenerowicz, Esq.
Jay M. Niederman, Esq.
Michael Magerer, Esq.
Molly J. Brown, Esq.
Michael P. Johnson, Esq.
Russell F. Hilliard, Esq.
Richard S. Loftus, Esq.
Mark A. Darling, Esq.
John L. Kerr, Esq.
Wilfred J. Desmarais, Jr., Esq.
Mark E. Howard, Esq.
Ralph Suozzo, Esq.
Jonathan M. Shirley, Esq.

2