Bourne v. Arruda

Filing 127

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion for Contempt and Entry of Default Judgment. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Samuel J. Bourne v. Civil No. 10-cv-393-LM John R. Arruda, Jr,. et al. NOTICE OF RULING Re: Document No. 121, Motion for Contempt Ruling: Bourne's motion (doc. no. 121) is granted in part and denied in part. The request for a contempt finding, for a default judgment, and for other sanctions relating to defendants' discovery responses and disclosures is denied, for reasons stated in defendants' objection to the motion (doc. no. 123). The motion is granted, only to the extent that the court grants Bourne's request for a subpoena. Bourne has also requested that this court issue a subpoena directing King to provide Bourne with the email addresses used by King in distributing case updates relating to the Bourne litigation, and also directing King to provide Bourne with copies of all of his emails relating either to this defamation case, or to defendants' alleged defamation of Bourne at the June 2010 and February 2011 selectmen's meetings. In light of Bourne's pro se status and given that the court has extended the summary judgment deadline in this case, the court grants the request for a subpoena and directs the clerk, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(3), to issue to Bourne a signed, blank subpoena, which Bourne may complete and serve upon Robert King. The court declines to issue any anticipatory ruling on any objection King or defendants may assert by motion or otherwise, if King is served with such a subpoena. __________________________ Landya McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge Date: July 16, 2012 cc: Samuel J. Bourne, pro se Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?