Bourne v. Arruda

Filing 147

ORDER re: 142 Motion to Compel. The court finds that to facilitate its consideration of the motion to compel, King must submit for in camera review, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, complete paper copies of th e documents identified as RDK007-RDK008, without redacting the contents that King claims to be irrelevant. The clerk is directed to file the documents upon receipt as sealed at Level II, subject to further order of this court, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Samuel J. Bourne v. Civil No. 10-cv-393-LM John R. Arruda, Jr., et al. O R D E R Before the court is Bourne’s motion to compel (doc. no. 142), which seeks an order compelling Robert King, a third party, to produce additional documents and information in response to a subpoena served upon him by Bourne. King served Bourne with an objection to the subpoena and, thereafter, produced a set of emails to Bourne that he considers to be responsive and not privileged, along with a privilege log listing additional documents as subject to attorney client privilege and/or work product protection. The documents produced to Bourne, as to which no claim of privilege is asserted, include several emails with portions of the contents blocked out, specifically, those emails included within documents identified as RDK007 and RDK008. King’s objection to the motion to compel (doc. no. 146) states that the redacted portions include text that is “unrelated to the defamation in question or the instant court case.” The court finds that to facilitate its consideration of the motion to compel, King must submit for in camera review, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, complete paper copies of the documents identified as RDK007-RDK008, without redacting the contents that King claims to be irrelevant. The clerk is directed to file the documents upon receipt as sealed at Level II, subject to further order of this court, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11. SO ORDERED. __________________________ Landya McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge August 30, 2012 cc: Samuel J. Bourne, pro se Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq. Robert King, pro se LBM:nmd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?