Higgins v. NH State Prison, Warden
Filing
9
/// ORDER approving 3 Report and Recommendations entered on February 1, 2012, approving 8 Report and Recommendations entered on June 6, 2012, and denying 6 Motion to Amend Petition. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jack Higgins
v.
Case No. 10-cv-436-SM
Warden, New Hampshire State Prison
ORDER
I herewith approve the Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge
Landya B. McCafferty dated February 1, 2012, and June 6, 2012, no objections
having been filed, fort the reasons set forth therein.
Petitioner’s Complaint
(document no. 1) is hereby dismissed, and his Motion to Amend Petition (document
no. 6) is hereby denied.
" '[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report
are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection
are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d
554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the
petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right, the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.§
2253(c)(2); Rule 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254;
First Cir. LR 22.0.
SO ORDERED.
June 29, 2012
cc:
Jack Higgins, pro se
/s/ Steven J. McAuliffe
_________________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?