Lawlor v. Bettez et al
Filing
34
ORDER re 33 Response/Objection to 32 Assented to Motion to Continue Trial. Plaintiff's pro se filing rejected as procedurally improper. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Chad Lawlor
v.
Civil No. 10-cv-445-JL
Jeffrey Bettez
O R D E R
Plaintiff Chad Lawlor’s pro se filing (doc. no. 33) is
rejected as procedurally improper.
"A district court enjoys wide
latitude in managing its docket and can require represented
parties to present motions through counsel.”
United States v.
Tracy, 989 F.2d 1279, 1286 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied,
U.S. 1031 (1994).
513
The court will accept no further pro se
filings by the plaintiff.
Plaintiff's counsel is directed to
file, under his signature and all that entails under Rule 11, all
future filings with the court.
SO ORDERED.
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Dated:
cc:
August 23, 2012
Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.
John A. Curran, Esq.
Nancy J. Smith, Esq.
Rebecca L. Woodward, Esq.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
