Oughman v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Filing
20
/// ORDER approving 5 Report and Recommendations; approving 14 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mohamed Ouahman
v.
Case No. 11-cv-75-SM
Hillsborough County Department
of Corrections, Superintendent, et al.
ORDER
I herewith approve the Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge
Landya B. McCafferty dated August 29, 2011, and October 25, 2011, for the reasons
set forth therein. No objections have been filed.
Plaintiff’s claims alleging: (1) violations of his equal protection rights in the
setting of his bail, (2) discrimination at the Hillsborough County House of
Correction, (3) retaliation, (4) inadequate medical care, (5) verbal harassment,
(6) excessive force, (7) spitting in his food, (8) denial of hygienic food, (9) denial
of hygiene items on one occasion by Officer Beaudoin, (10) denial of toothbrush
and soap access for thirty-six hours in maximum security, (11) denial of nutritious
food, and (12) being provided with pork meals for a week and retaliation are
hereby dismissed. Defendants Meurin, Fitzpatrick, Beaudoin, Cussan and
Superintendent James O’Mara , as well as plaintiff’s supervisory liability claims, are
also dismissed from this action.
The case will proceed on plaintiff’s RLUIPA and First Amendment claims,
against Lt. Scurry (denial of a prayer rug, a Qur’an, and accommodations for the
observance of Ramadan) and Sgt. Barnes (denial of Qur’an and Fourteenth
Amendment due process rights by subjecting him to unnecessarily restrictive
housing conditions.).
SO ORDERED.
November 16 , 2011
cc:
Mohamed Ouahman, pro se
John A. Curran, Esq.
/s/ Steven J. McAuliffe
_________________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?