Oughman v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent

Filing 20

/// ORDER approving 5 Report and Recommendations; approving 14 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Mohamed Ouahman v. Case No. 11-cv-75-SM Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, et al. ORDER I herewith approve the Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated August 29, 2011, and October 25, 2011, for the reasons set forth therein. No objections have been filed. Plaintiff’s claims alleging: (1) violations of his equal protection rights in the setting of his bail, (2) discrimination at the Hillsborough County House of Correction, (3) retaliation, (4) inadequate medical care, (5) verbal harassment, (6) excessive force, (7) spitting in his food, (8) denial of hygienic food, (9) denial of hygiene items on one occasion by Officer Beaudoin, (10) denial of toothbrush and soap access for thirty-six hours in maximum security, (11) denial of nutritious food, and (12) being provided with pork meals for a week and retaliation are hereby dismissed. Defendants Meurin, Fitzpatrick, Beaudoin, Cussan and Superintendent James O’Mara , as well as plaintiff’s supervisory liability claims, are also dismissed from this action. The case will proceed on plaintiff’s RLUIPA and First Amendment claims, against Lt. Scurry (denial of a prayer rug, a Qur’an, and accommodations for the observance of Ramadan) and Sgt. Barnes (denial of Qur’an and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by subjecting him to unnecessarily restrictive housing conditions.). SO ORDERED. November 16 , 2011 cc: Mohamed Ouahman, pro se John A. Curran, Esq. /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe _________________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?