Podkulski v. Doe et al
Filing
138
///ORDER approving 135 Report and Recommendation; denying 128 Motion for Leave to File 5th Amended Complaint. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Steve Podkulski
v.
Civil No. 11cv102-JL
Doe et al
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated October 8, 2014.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: November 3, 2014
cc:
Steve Podkulski, pro se
John A. Curran, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?