Podkulski v. Doe et al
Filing
56
///ORDER approving 46 Report and Recommendation, recommending that Claims 2(a), 2(d), and 2(f)and all claims asserted against Office Hujsak be dismissed. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Steve Podkulski
v.
Civil No. 11-cv-102-JL
Doe et al
ORDER
After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated October 11,
2011. " '[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report
are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection
are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d
554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
November 23, 2012
cc:
Steve Podkulski, Pro se
John A. Curran, Esq.
_________________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?