Podkulski v. Doe et al
Filing
72
ORDER approving 71 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(ko)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Steve Podkulski
v.
Civil No. 11-cv-102-JL
Doe et al
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated
June 18, 2013.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections
to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988));
see also United States v.
Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
Additionally, finding that the
petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a certificate
of appealability.
See 28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2); Rule 11, Rules
Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254; First Cir. LR 22.0.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: July 9, 2013
cc:
Steve Podkulski
John A. Curran, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?