Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al

Filing 32

ORDER re: 30 Motion to Compel and 31 Objection to Motion/Request for Extension. Set ddls re: 30 MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Request for Admission. Follow up on Further Response on 5/15/2012; Reply on 5/29/2012. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Osahenrumwen Ojo
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-210-JL

Hillsborough County Department
of Corrections et al.

O R D E R
Plaintiff has filed “Motion: for Report of Violation of
Rules” (doc. no. 30).

Defendants object (doc. no. 31).

Defendants’ objection was filed beyond the deadline for
responding to the underlying motion (doc. no. 30).

The court

notes, however, that defendants’ objection (doc. no. 31)
includes a request for an extension of time, until May 15, 2012,
to file a supplemental response to plaintiff’s motion (doc. no.
30).

Defendants’ request for an extension of time is supported

by good cause.

The court therefore grants the requested

extension nunc pro tunc, and directs defendants to file a
further response to plaintiff’s motion (doc. no. 30) by May 15,
2012.

After the filing of defendants’ response, plaintiff will

be granted fourteen days to file a reply thereto.
The substance of plaintiff’s motion (doc. no. 30), as well
as defendants’ substantive objection (doc. no. 31), are taken

under advisement.

The court will consider the merits of

plaintiff’s motion, and defendants’ objections and responses
thereto, upon filing of the documents authorized in this order.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________
Landya McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
May 3, 2012
cc:

Osahenrumwen Ojo, pro se
John A. Curran, Esq.

LBM:jba

2