Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al

Filing 42

ORDER limiting remote access to attachments to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 41 as they contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Osahenrumwen Ojo
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-210-JL

Eldin Medic, et al.

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS

Certain Attachments to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned
case contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this
information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person
whose personal information is contained in the Attachments to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary
Judgment. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote
electronic access to the Attachments to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, the clerk shall
limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
Date: June 14, 2012
cc:

Osahenrumwen Ojo, pro se
John Curran, Esq.