Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
Filing
60
ORDER denying without prejudice to refiling if the recommendation is not approved 51 Motion for Leave to File Goulding's and Medic's Signature affidavits. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Osahenrumwen Ojo
v.
Civil No. 11-cv-210-JL
Eldin Medic et al.
O R D E R
Plaintiff has filed a “Motion for Submission of Defendants
Goulding’s and Medic’s Signature Affidavit” (doc. no. 51),
asserting that the “signature affidavits” defendants provided to
Ojo in discovery should be filed here “in conjunction with
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.”
While it is not
entirely clear why Ojo seeks to submit these documents, his
reasoning is immaterial at this point, as the magistrate judge
has recommended denial of the summary judgment motion for
reasons unaffected by the defendants’ signatures or their
affidavits.
Accordingly, the motion to file “signature
affidavits” (doc. no. 51) is denied, without prejudice to
refiling if the recommendation is not approved.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________
Landya McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
October 1, 2012
cc: Osahenrumwen Ojo, pro se
John A. Curran, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?