Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al

Filing 69

ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access to Attachments 5-9 of Document 67 Plaintiff's Objection to Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Osahenrumwen Ojo v. Civil No. 11-cv-210-JL Eldin Medic, et al. ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS Exhibits identified as attachments 5-9 in support of Plaintiff’s Objection to Motion for Summary Judgment, Document #67, in the above-captioned case contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is contained in the Exhibits. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to Exhibits 5-9, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ Daniel J. Lynch _________________________________ Daniel J. Lynch United States Magistrate Judge Date: October 29, 2012 cc: Osahenrumwen Ojo, pro se John Curran, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?