Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
Filing
69
ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access to Attachments 5-9 of Document 67 Plaintiff's Objection to Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Osahenrumwen Ojo
v.
Civil No. 11-cv-210-JL
Eldin Medic, et al.
ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS
Exhibits identified as attachments 5-9 in support of Plaintiff’s Objection to Motion for
Summary Judgment, Document #67, in the above-captioned case contain one or more personal
identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the Internet
may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is contained in
the Exhibits. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote
electronic access to Exhibits 5-9, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Daniel J. Lynch
_________________________________
Daniel J. Lynch
United States Magistrate Judge
Date: October 29, 2012
cc:
Osahenrumwen Ojo, pro se
John Curran, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?