Ojo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al

Filing 70

ORDER approving 59 Report and Recommendation; denying 40 and 41 Motions for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Osahenrumwen Ojo v. Civil No. 11-cv-210-JL Eldin Medic, et al. ORDER After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated October 1, 2012. " '[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. November 4, 2012 cc: Osahenrumwen Ojo, pro se John Curran, Esq. _________________________________ Joseph N. Laplante Chief Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?