Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Filing
21
///ORDER granting 17 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Gilbert W. Cox,
Plaintiff
v.
Case No. 11-cv-280-SM
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.,
Defendant
O R D E R
Re:
(Document No. 17)
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Ruling: Granted. Plaintiff has filed neither a timely
objection or response to the pending dispositive motion,
notwithstanding a courtesy reminder call from the deputy clerk.
There being no objection, then, the facts supportably asserted by
the defendant are taken as undisputed. Given the undisputed
facts, and essentially for the reasons urged by defendant in its
supporting memorandum of law, summary judgment shall be entered
in favor of the defendant and the clerk shall close the case.
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date:
cc:
May 22, 2012
Andrew L. Baldwin, Esq.
Richard E. Briansky, Esq.
Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.
Raymond J. DiLucci, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?