Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

Filing 21

///ORDER granting 17 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Gilbert W. Cox, Plaintiff v. Case No. 11-cv-280-SM Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., Defendant O R D E R Re: (Document No. 17) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Ruling: Granted. Plaintiff has filed neither a timely objection or response to the pending dispositive motion, notwithstanding a courtesy reminder call from the deputy clerk. There being no objection, then, the facts supportably asserted by the defendant are taken as undisputed. Given the undisputed facts, and essentially for the reasons urged by defendant in its supporting memorandum of law, summary judgment shall be entered in favor of the defendant and the clerk shall close the case. Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: cc: May 22, 2012 Andrew L. Baldwin, Esq. Richard E. Briansky, Esq. Peter G. Callaghan, Esq. Raymond J. DiLucci, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?