Potvin et al v. Paul Law Office, PLLC

Filing 7

ORDER re 6 Notice of Withdrawal of Notice of Settlement. No proof that the defendants were ever served. The plaintiff shall serve the defendant and resubmit a certificate of service upon how service was effectuated. Defendant to answer 21 days from date of service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(ko)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Potvin, et al.
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-308-LM

Paul Law Office, PLLC, et al.

O R D E R
Upon a review of the plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Notice
of Settlement (document no. 6), the certificate of service indicates
that service was effectuated by the court's CM/ECF system.

In fact,

as the defendants have not yet filed an answer or otherwise appeared
in this case, they are not receiving electronic notices through the
court's CM/ECF system.

Thus, there is no proof that the defendants

were ever served with the notice of withdrawal of settlement in this
case.
As a result, the plaintiffs shall serve the above-referenced
pleading on the defendants in a manner authorized by Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(b)(2) and shall resubmit a certificate of service indicating
the manner and date upon which service was effectuated.

The

defendants shall have 21 days from the date of service to file an
answer or otherwise plead as permitted in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12.

SO ORDERED.
November 4, 2011

cc:

James D. Kelly, Esq.

/s/ Daniel J. Lynch
Daniel J. Lynch,
Chief Deputy Clerk