Eastman v. New Hampshire, State of et al

Filing 6

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS: Good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the Exhibit 4 (doc. no. 1-5) and Exhibit 5 (doc. no. 1-6) to 1 Complaint, therefore the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (vln)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven F. Eastman
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-316-SM

State of New Hampshire, et al.

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS

Plaintiff’s Exhibit 4 (doc. no. 1-5) and Exhibit 5 (doc. no. 1-6) to the Complaint in the
above-captioned case contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a).
Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to
the person whose personal information is contained in the exhibits. Therefore, because good
cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the exhibits, the
clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 5, 2011

cc:

Steven F. Eastman