Cadell v. XL Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 61

ORDER granting 60 Motion Regarding Confidentiality. Clerk shall unseal the documents referred to as well as the court's 1/31/13 Order. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Sherry Cadell v. Civil No. 11-cv-394-JD XL Specialty Insurance Company O R D E R On March 15, 2013, the court issued a procedural order informing the parties that unless they filed a motion requesting that document nos. 45, 46, 47, 50, 52, and 53, as well as the court’s January 31, 2013, order remain confidential, the court would unseal those documents and the order. On March 22, 2013, the defendant filed an assented-to motion indicating that it does not oppose the unsealing of any of the documents or the court’s January 31, 2013, order, but requesting that any attachments to document nos. 46 and 53 remain confidential. Neither document no. 46 nor document no. 53 contains an attachment. Therefore, document nos. 45, 46, 47, 50, 52, and 53, as well as the court’s January 31, 2013, order, will be unsealed. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s assented-to motion regarding confidentiality (document no. 60) is granted. The clerk shall unseal the documents referred to above, as well as the court’s January 31, 2013, order. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. United States District Judge March 27, 2013 cc: John C. Barker, Esquire Richard C. Demerle, Esquire John E. Durkin, Esquire Paul Michienzie, Esquire 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?