Cadell v. XL Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 68

ORDER granting in part as provided in this order 67 Motion to Seal Stipulation; motion unsealed. Stipulation 66 is approved. In lieu of sealing the stipulation, original will be returned to the filer and corresponding electronic document removed from CM/ECF. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Sherry Cadell
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-394-JD

XL Specialty Insurance Company
O R D E R
The parties in this case reached a confidential settlement
agreement.

Sherry Cadell moves to file under seal a stipulation

on the workers’ compensation lien and holiday.

The motion to

seal the stipulation is currently under seal.

As recognized in

the court’s previous order on sealing documents in this case, a
material term of the settlement agreement is that the specific
details of the settlement are to be kept confidential.
Cadell did not move for leave to file the motion to seal
(document no. 67) under seal.
keep the motion under seal.

There appears to be no need to
Therefore, it will be unsealed.

With respect to the stipulation, Cadell explains that it is
necessary to seal the stipulation to protect the confidentiality
of the settlement agreement.

The stipulation is approved.

stipulation contains details of the settlement.

The

In lieu of

sealing the stipulation, the original copy of the stipulation
(document no. 66) will be returned to the filer, and the
corresponding electronic document will be removed from CM/ECF.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the motion to file the
stipulation under seal (document no. 67) is granted in part as is
provided in this order.
The motion to seal the stipulation (document no. 67) is
unsealed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________
Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.
United States District Judge
May 22, 2013
cc:

John C. Barker, Esquire
Richard C. Demerle, Esquire
John E. Durkin, Esquire
Paul Michienzie, Esquire

2