Osgood v. Kent et al

Filing 8

ORDER striking 7 Return of Service Executed, 6 Return of Service Executed. It is herewith ordered that the documents are stricken and Tina Osgood, the interested party entered during filing, be removed from the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jeffrey Osgood
v
.

Civil No. 11-cv-477-LM

George Kent et al.

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5.2

DOCUMENT/FILER: #6 and #7, Return of Service Executed as to Jeffrey Osgood of Subpoena to
Produce Documents and Subpoena for Deposition, and Return of Service
Executed as to Tina Osgood of Subpoena to Produce Documents and Subpoena for
deposition, filed by Evelyn Kent
DATE FILED:

October 19, 2011

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1) Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) or (2) and the following
discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court
orders filing: depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents or tangible things or to permit entry
onto land, and requests for admissions.
It is herewith ordered that the documents are stricken and Tina Osgood, the interested party
entered during filing, be removed from the docket.

SO ORDERED.

Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
October 24, 2011

cc: Aaron H. Simpson, Esq.
David P. Cullenberg, Esq.