Palermo v. Edmark et al

Filing 30

ORDER re Attachments to 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel. As the attachments contain one or more personal identifiers, remote access is limited. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christopher M. Palermo
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-506-JD

Michael Edmark, et al.

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS

The Attachments to Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, Document #29 in the
above-captioned case, contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a).
Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the
person whose personal information is contained in the Attachments to the Motion to Appoint
Counsel. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote
electronic access to the Attachments to the Motion to Appoint Counsel, the clerk shall limit remote
access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 20, 2012

cc:

Christopher M. Palermo, pro se
Nancy Smith, Esq.
Russell Hilliard, Esq.