Palermo v. Edmark et al
ORDER re Attachments to 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel. As the attachments contain one or more personal identifiers, remote access is limited. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Christopher M. Palermo
Civil No. 11-cv-506-JD
Michael Edmark, et al.
ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS
The Attachments to Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, Document #29 in the
above-captioned case, contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a).
Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the
person whose personal information is contained in the Attachments to the Motion to Appoint
Counsel. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote
electronic access to the Attachments to the Motion to Appoint Counsel, the clerk shall limit remote
access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
Date: August 20, 2012
Christopher M. Palermo, pro se
Nancy Smith, Esq.
Russell Hilliard, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?