Palermo v. Edmark et al

Filing 30

ORDER re Attachments to 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel. As the attachments contain one or more personal identifiers, remote access is limited. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Christopher M. Palermo v. Civil No. 11-cv-506-JD Michael Edmark, et al. ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS The Attachments to Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, Document #29 in the above-captioned case, contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is contained in the Attachments to the Motion to Appoint Counsel. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the Attachments to the Motion to Appoint Counsel, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ Landya B. McCafferty Landya B. McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge Date: August 20, 2012 cc: Christopher M. Palermo, pro se Nancy Smith, Esq. Russell Hilliard, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?