Amatucci v. Hamilton et al
Filing
3
ORDER PROHIBITING ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO Exhibits 9 & 10 of the 1 Complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(amm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Josephine Amatucci
v.
Civil No. 11-cv-512-SM
Charles Hamilton, et al
ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS
Exhibits 9 and 10 to the Complaint in the above-captioned case contain one or more
personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the
Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is
contained in the Exhibits 9 and 10 to the Complaint. Therefore, because good cause exists to
prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the Exhibits 9 and 10 to the
Complaint, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
Date: November 4, 2011
cc:
Josephine Amatucci
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?