Amatucci v. Hamilton et al

Filing 3

ORDER PROHIBITING ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO Exhibits 9 & 10 of the 1 Complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(amm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Josephine Amatucci v. Civil No. 11-cv-512-SM Charles Hamilton, et al ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS Exhibits 9 and 10 to the Complaint in the above-captioned case contain one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is contained in the Exhibits 9 and 10 to the Complaint. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the Exhibits 9 and 10 to the Complaint, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ Landya B. McCafferty Landya B. McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge Date: November 4, 2011 cc: Josephine Amatucci

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?