McCarvill v. Fahey

Filing 14

PROCEDURAL ORDER re 13 Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff to file memorandum as outlined by January 5, 2012. Defendant's time to respond to amended motion for preliminary injunction stayed. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Kathleen J. McCarvill
v.

Civil No. 11-cv-530-JL

Michael R. Fahey
PROCEDURAL ORDER
On or before January 5, 2012, the plaintiff shall file a
memorandum, not to exceed 10 pages, showing cause why her amended
motion for preliminary injunction (document no. 13) should not be
denied in light of the Supreme Court's holding in Grupo Mexicano
de Desarrallo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308, 333
(1999), that a federal "District Court ha[s] no authority to
issue a preliminary injunction preventing [a defendant] from
disposing of [its] assets pending adjudication of [a plaintiff's]
. . . claim for money damages."
to the amended motion is stayed.

The defendant's time to respond
The court shall inform the

parties if it requires further briefing on any issue relative to
the motion.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Dated: December 28, 2011

cc:

Clara Ann Dietel, Esq.
Paul F. Kfoury, Sr., Esq.
Debbie Lorusso Makris, Esq.

2