Iryzarry v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al

Filing 10

ORDER Copies of documents 8 and 9 are to be resent, deadlines to responding t0 these documents are extended 9 Order to Amend, 8 Report and Recommendations., ( Amended Pleadings due by 3/12/2011., Follow up on Objections to R&R on 2/23/2012.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(mm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Charles Iryzarry v. Civil No. 11-cv-202-PB Stephen Church, Superintendent, Rockingham County Department of Corrections, et al. O R D E R On December 21, 2011, this court issued a report and recommendation (doc. no. 8) and order to amend (doc. no. 9) in this case. The report and recommendation (doc. no. 8) recommended that all but one claim in the complaint (doc nos. 1 and 3) be dismissed, and provided Iryzarry with fourteen days in which to object to that recommendation. The order to amend (doc. no. 9) directed Iryzarry within thirty days to name a defendant to his claim alleging that he was denied adequate mental health care. Iryzarry has neither objected to the report and recommendation nor filed any request to amend his complaint. Upon reviewing the docket, the court notes that the docket contains no docket entry documenting that the report and recommendation and order were in fact mailed to Iryzarry. To insure that Iryzarry has received copies of those documents, the Clerk’s office is directed to send Iryzarry a copy of the report and recommendation (doc. no. 8) and the order to amend (doc. no. 9). The deadlines in the report and recommendation (14 days to object) and the order (30 days to amend the complaint) are extended to run from the date of this order. SO ORDERED. __________________________ Landya McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge February 9, 2012 cc: Charles Iryzarry, pro se LBM:jba 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?