Fox v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Filing
60
ORDER denying 57 Defendants' Proposed Discovery Plan to the extent it is inconsistent with this scheduling order. (Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 9/10/2013; Discovery deadline 3/3/2014; Summary Judgment Motions due by 1/10/2014 and Ready for Trial on 5/20/2014) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Duane Leroy Fox
v.
Civil No. 11-cv-295-SM
Strafford County Department
of Corrections
O R D E R
On June 4, 2013, a preliminary pretrial conference was
held in this case.
Plaintiff appeared via telephone on his
own behalf; Attorney Corey M. Belobrow appeared for
defendants.
The parties had very few disagreements with
respect to scheduling.
The court discussed the
disagreements and resolved them to the parties’
satisfaction.
The terms of the discovery order are summarized below.
Scheduling Designation
Deadline
Track Assignment
Standard - 12 months
Interrogatories
Requests for Admission
Depositions
Amendment of Pleadings
A maximum of 25 interrogatories
by each party to any other
party. Responses due pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 29.
A maximum of 25 requests by each
party to any other party.
Responses due pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 29.
A maximum of 10 depositions by
plaintiff and 10 depositions by
defendants.
Plaintiff: July 1, 2013
Defendants: August 20, 2013
Joinder of Additional
Parties
August 20, 2013
Third-Party Actions
August 20, 2013
Motions to Dismiss
September 10, 2013
Disclosure of Claims
Against Unnamed Parties
October 1, 2013 (Defendants
disclosed one unnamed party in
doc. no. 57)
Plaintiff: October 1, 2013
Defendants: December 15, 2013
Experts and Experts'
Written Reports
Motions for Summary
Judgment
Experts' Written
Supplementations under
Rule 26(e)
January 10, 2014
Plaintiff: January 15, 2014
Defendants: February 15, 2014
Completion of Discovery
March 1, 2014
Challenges to Expert
Testimony
Plaintiff: February 1, 2014
Defendants: January 2, 2014
Trial Date
May 20, 2014
To the extent the defendants’ proposed discovery plan
(doc. no. 57) is inconsistent with the above scheduling
order, it is denied.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
June 4, 2013
cc:
Duane Leory Fox, pro se
Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?