Fox v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent

Filing 64

ORDER approving 61 Report and Recommendation; denying 49 Motion to Amend the Complaint ; denying 50 Motion to Amend the Complaint. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Duane Leroy Fox
v.
Case N o . 11-cv-295-SM
Michael Clancy, et a l .

O R D E R

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B . McCafferty dated
June 4 , 2013.

“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections

to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union N o . 37 v . United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 5 5 4 , 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v . Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 2 7 1 , 275 (1st Cir.1988));

see also United States v .

Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4 , 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
Plaintiff’s Motions to Amend his complaint (document nos. 49
and 50) are hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: June 2 6 , 2013
cc:

Duane Leroy Fox, pro se
Corey M . Belobrow, Esq.