Russo v. New Hampshire, State of

Filing 72

// ORDER approving 32 Report and Recommendation with respect to remaining claims 1 and 4. Those claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's directives and failure to demonstrate exhaustion of available state court remedies with respect to those claims. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The clerk shall close this case. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Amato John Russo, Petitioner v. Case No. ll-cv-587-SM State of New Hampshire, Respondent O R D E R Notwithstanding the appointment of counsel to assist him, and repeated extensions of time to afford him a full opportunity to demonstrate exhaustion of state remedies with respect to the federal claims he seeks to assert in his habeas corpus petition, as required, petitioner has utterly failed to comply with the directives of the court as set out in its order dated August 17, 2012 (docket no. 44), as reiterated at the hearing held on February 2, 2014. Claims 2 and 3 set out in the petition as construed by the Magistrate Judge were withdrawn by petitioner a hearing held on February 2, 2014. Report and Recommendation The (docket no. 32) is approved and adopted with respect to the remaining claims. Those claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's directives and failure to demonstrate exhaustion of available state court remedies with respect to those claims. 28 U . S .C .ยง2254(b)(1). Pursuant to Rule 11, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, although petitioner may seek such a certificate from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b). The clerk shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Date: March 19, 2014 cc: Amato John Russo, Pro se - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?