Fischer v. Firman et al
Filing
7
ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(mxm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Madalyn Barton Fischer
v.
Civil No. 12-cv-146-PB
Aaron Firman et al.1
O R D E R
Before the court is a motion for the appointment of counsel
(doc. no. 3) filed by in forma pauperis, pro se plaintiff
Madalyn Fischer.
Plaintiff asserts that she cannot afford
counsel, and that she has been told that she needs a lawyer who
is admitted to practice in both the United States and Canada to
represent her on her claims.
In a report and recommendation
issued on this date, this magistrate judge has recommended that
this action be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff has
failed to show that the court has subject matter jurisdiction
over her claims.
The court, therefore, denies the motion for
appointment of counsel as moot, without prejudice to plaintiff’s
1
Defendants are the plaintiff’s son-in-law Aaron Firman, her
daughter Kelly Barton Firman, and the First National Bank of
Canada.
ability to renew the motion if the report and recommendation is
not accepted.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________
Landya McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
June 19, 2012
cc:
Madalyn Fischer, pro se
LBM:nmd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?