Phaneuf, et al v. NH Board of Registration of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, et al

Filing 18

///ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(vln)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Arthur O. Phaneuf, et al v. Civil No. 12-cv-160-SM NH Board of Registration of Funeral Directors and Embalmers NOTICE OF RULING / ORDER Re: Document No. 13, Motion to Dismiss Ruling: Abstention under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) is appropriate. Plaintiffs concede that the first two prongs of the Younger test are met. As to the third prong, plaintiffs have not provided "unambiguous authority" to rebut the presumption "that state procedures will afford an adequate remedy." Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1, 15 (1987). In addition, this case does not fall under any exception to Younger. Although plaintiffs allege general bias on the part of the state administrative board, they do not plausibly allege bias on the part of the New Hampshire Superior Court, which may intervene to enjoin biased administrative proceedings. See Thompson v. New Hampshire Bd. of Medicine, 143 N.H. 107, 110 (1998). There are, therefore, no "extraordinary circumstances" that would override mandatory abstention under Younger. See Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Cotto, 389 F.3d 212, 222 (1st Cir. 2004)(bias exception to Younger abstention was not triggered where state court interlocutory review of biased administrative proceeding was available). Because plaintiffs seek only declaratory and injunctive relief, the case is dismissed. See Rossi v. Gemma, 489 F.3d 26, 37 (1st Cir. 2007)(dismissal, not stay, is warranted where no money damages are sought). The Clerk shall close the case. So ordered. August 14, 2012 cc: ______________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Court Frank B. Mesmer, Jr., Esq. Laura E.B. Lombardi, Esq. James Spencer Culp, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?