USA v. Audi RS6 Sedan 2003
Filing
10
ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access to Exhibit 6 to 9 Answer to Complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
USA
v.
Civil No. 12-cv-210-JL
Audi RS6 Sedan 2003
ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS
Exhibit 6 to Claimant’s Answer to Complaint, Document #9, in the above-captioned case
contains one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information
available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal
information is contained in Exhibit 6. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty
from obtaining remote electronic access to Exhibit 6 to Claimant’s Answer to Complaint, the clerk
shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
Date: November 27, 2012
cc:
Robert Rabuck, Esq.
Brian Johnson, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?