USA v. Audi RS6 Sedan 2003

Filing 10

ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access to Exhibit 6 to 9 Answer to Complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE USA v. Civil No. 12-cv-210-JL Audi RS6 Sedan 2003 ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS Exhibit 6 to Claimant’s Answer to Complaint, Document #9, in the above-captioned case contains one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information is contained in Exhibit 6. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to Exhibit 6 to Claimant’s Answer to Complaint, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ Landya B. McCafferty Landya B. McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge Date: November 27, 2012 cc: Robert Rabuck, Esq. Brian Johnson, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?