Puiia v. New Hampshire, State of

Filing 9

ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion to Expedite; denying as moot 7 Motion to Expedite. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(mm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael E. Puiia
v.

Civil No. 12-cv-243-PB

State of New Hampshire
O R D E R
Before the court are two non-dispositive motions filed by
plaintiff for the court’s consideration, entitled “Expedited
Motion for Magistrate Findings” (doc. no. 6) and “Emergency
Motion to Expedite Service/Summons” (doc. no. 7).

For the

reasons stated herein, both motions are denied.
This matter, filed pro se and in forma pauperis, originally
came before the magistrate judge for a preliminary review
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and United States District
Court District of New Hampshire Local Rule (“LR”) 4.3(d)(1)(B).
Puiia has also filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief
(doc. no. 3), which was referred to this magistrate judge for
consideration and a recommendation as to disposition (doc. no.
4).

On this date, this magistrate judge has issued a report and

recommendation, recommending that the complaint (doc. no. 1) be
dismissed and that the motion for preliminary relief (doc. no.
3) be denied.

Because the court’s preliminary review and review of the
request for preliminary injunctive relief is complete, the
motion to expedite the magistrate judge’s review and findings
(doc. no. 6) is denied as moot.

Similarly, because the court

has recommended dismissal of this action, the motion to expedite
the issuance of summonses and to expedite service in this matter
(doc. no. 7), is also denied as moot.
SO ORDERED.

__________________________
Landya McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
July 18, 2012
cc:

Michael E. Puiia, pro se

LBM:jba

2